• FIND Pre-screened, full-service heating oil suppliers in your neighborhood.
  • GET Up to three competitive quotes on heating oil or new equipment.
  • SAVE As much as $300-$400 on your heating oil bills this winter.

  • Need a New Heating Oil Company?

    Get up to three free quotes from pre-screened heating oil suppliers. Save up to $400 next winter.

Report Reveals Huge Hidden Cost of Coal: $62 Billion per Year

1 Comments

Posted by Kristy Kershaw on October 21, 2009 at 4:11 pm


(image: abc.net.au)

(image: abc.net.au)

Is coal cheap? As David Roberts of Grist.org reported Tuesday, that answer is not nearly as cheap as it seems.  Calling the findings from a National Research Council study on the hidden costs of energy “stunning,” Roberts asks readers to keep those results in mind the next time someone tries to say “coal is cheap.”

The report, spearheaded in 2005, focuses on externalities, an economic term used to denote hidden costs, those paid indirectly. For example, in the realm of producing and using energy, there are huge costs that are not necessarily passed along to the consumer, but paid indirectly through health-care spending or environmental-remediation costs. But as Roberts points out, costs are costs, and somebody has to pay them.

Even with the report ignoring costs associated with ecological damage, security, mercury pollution, and taxpayer impact to name a few, the NRC found $120 billion in hidden costs in 2005. Of that enormous number, $62 billion – over half – came from coal-fired electricity plants.

With coal representing 95 percent of the U.S.’s fossil fuels, and 50 percent of the country’s electricity production, these findings are a big deal. The coal lobby is also one of the major opponents of the current climate bill, as the industry would pay dearly under the proposed cap and trade system.  As for the effect on heating oil consumers, such costs amount to a huge subsidy for dirty energy sources, which eventually, and indirectly, leads to higher energy bills for everyone.


Share


One Response to “Report Reveals Huge Hidden Cost of Coal: $62 Billion per Year”

  1. Wow. I didn’t really think about the cost of coal being indirectly linked to health care costs. That makes sense. I especially can see this being the case in working class/low income environments - (i.e. the workers’ health). I wonder where most coal plants are located in the US. If my assumption is correct that these plants aren’t located in affluent areas but in rural and/or urban areas, then yes - totally get the link to coal costs and health care/environmental costs.

    I searched coal plants in the US - specifically my home state (Ohio) and found that most of these plants are, in fact, located in rural/urban areas.

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Category:Existing_coal_plants_in_Ohio

    Interesting stuff!

Leave a Reply