• FIND Pre-screened, full-service heating oil suppliers in your neighborhood.
  • GET Up to three competitive quotes on heating oil or new equipment.
  • SAVE As much as $300-$400 on your heating oil bills this winter.

Investment Banks Slash Oil Price Forecasts

1 Comments

Posted by Jackson Stone on August 26, 2011 at 4:48 am


There are hopes the rebels' advance will topple Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and allow the country to resume production of its 1.3 million daily barrels of crude. (image: thetechherald.com)

There are hopes the rebels' advance will topple Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and allow the country to resume production of its 1.3 million daily barrels of crude. (image: thetechherald.com)

Some of the biggest Wall Street investment banks have slashed their oil price forecasts to reflect developments in Libya and general economic gloom.

But the bearish sentiments come just weeks after Goldman Sachs and the International Energy Agency predicted surging world demand would send crude and heating oil prices higher next year.

JP Morgan and Citibank Group both trimmed their projected prices for crude this week, citing waning oil demand forecasts and an improving supply picture, marketwatch.com reported. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs sounded notes of caution.

Citigroup’s projections were the most dramatic. The bank cut its price forecast for the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude to $72 a barrel for 2012 – down from a previous forecast of $80. Crude oil contracts were selling for more than $85 a barrel yesterday.

“Falling oil demand growth is paralleling recent macroeconomic headlines and points to lower prices ahead,” the bank said in a note.

The price revision comes amid fears the world economy is slipping back into recession following sovereign debt crises in Europe and worrying economic signals from the US – the world’s biggest oil using nation.

But the discounted forecasts also reflect this week’s developments in Libya. Oil prices spiked this year to 30-month highs after a civil war to topple Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi halted production of the North African country’s 1.3 million daily barrels of crude, disrupting world oil supply. But now that rebels have stormed the capital Tripoli, there are hopes Gadhafi will be forced from power and Libya’s oil production can soon resume.

JP Morgan also lowered its price projection, tipping Europe’s benchmark crude, Brent, would slip $9 next year to $115 a barrel. Goldman Sachs acknowledged that a speedy end to violence in Libya could boost the world’s oil supply. Morgan Stanley said a return of Libyan production would dent its oil price outlook in the short-term.

Oil prices, which peaked at $140 a barrel in 2008, crashed to $30 a barrel when the global financial crisis hit and demand bottomed out. This week’s revised price forecasts carry significant weight in oil markets and are watched closely by investors for signals of where the market is headed.

As heating oil prices are closely linked to those of crude, a drop in actual prices would likely lead to savings for home heating oil customers. But many commentators are picking prices to surge again when demand peaks this winter.


Share


One Response to “Investment Banks Slash Oil Price Forecasts”

  1. OPEC, Libya and the laws of supply and demand are not responsible for high heating oil and oil prices. The oil price is dictated by the fraudulent “round-trip” trades of the “dark pool” trading in the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Atlanta. The international Big Oil/big banking cabal owns ICE. ICE operates outside of US law. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has no jurisdiction over ICE, bribed by Big Oil. ICE’s energy traders and speculators can ratchet-up the oil price anytime they feel like it, for their own profits and on the behalf of Big Oil, through the use of “round-trip” trades. Google the “Global Oil Scam.” ICE is a super Enron. Oil is too critical a resource to controlled and manipulated by greedy refiners, greedy traders, greedy corporations and greedy speculators.

Leave a Reply